User talk:Ballsdeep Singh

March 2014

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Jennifer Rattray. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 00:05, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jennifer Rattray. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 00:15, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jennifer Rattray, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jim1138 (talk) 00:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Rattray

The citation states that Rattray "works with", nothing about "appointed by". Please use sources that support your statements. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 00:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jim1138, please read my statements more carefully. I stated she was appointed in 2004, under the presidency of Axworthy. Nowhere did I state he appointed her. Please be more careful editing material. Thank you.

The source does not say he appointed her. Jim1138 (talk) 00:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jim1138 please see my latest edit. I am quoting directly from a source. I hope this is acceptable. I hope you will accept the truth. Ballsdeep Singh (talk) 01:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ballsdeep Singh, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Ballsdeep Singh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

May I suggest using template:cite web, template:cite news, template:cite book, and perhaps template:cite journal? This will make your citations more useful, easily readable, and have a more 'professional appearance'. An inline citation would go something like <ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2002/mar/09/religion.schools1 |title= A scientist's view |last= Dawkins |first= Richard |date= 9 March 2002 |work= [[The Guardian]] |accessdate= 2009-11-07 |location= London}}</ref> (leave out the no wikis) This would generate a citation :

Dawkins, Richard (9 March 2002). "A scientist's view". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 2009-11-07.

May I suggest enabling your email (in Preferences / User profile tab at the bottom of the page)? It allows recovery of a lost password. It might get you some other suggestions.

As to Jennifer Rattray, have you carefully studied wp:notability (people), other wp:AfDs as to what works and what does not? Also research other articles of people with similar backgrounds who appear to have passed the notability hurdle. Having Jennifer Rattray's article have a similar format to well-written BLPs might help a bit. You could also copy the article to your sandbox so that if it gets deleted, you can still work on the article and bring it up to standards. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Poor Ballsdeep, dear cousin, do they really think you are a sock puppet. This is pure wiki-racism dear friend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TippdeepSingh (talk • contribs) 02:26, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]