User talk:Baptist1234

Welcome!

Hello, Baptist1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Climate of Sydney did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. HiLo48 (talk) 05:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 Australian federal election. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Canley (talk) 10:12, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 Australian federal election, you may be blocked from editing. --Canley (talk) 06:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Baptist1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have learnt from my terrible mistakes and am only going to use this account from now on

Decline reason:

This account is not blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 13:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2021

Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Jeremy Clarkson, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add an inappropriate image, as you did at Jeremy Clarkson. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Baptist1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why was i banned? i was just adding more info like how storms often dissipate before they reach the coast of sydney australia . I'm sorry if i broke any rules but you could of told me first.

Accept reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Baptist1234, you had been informed about Wikipedia's need for verifiability on 4 January 2020, as the topic of the first message on this page. That had been about Special:Diff/934002279 at Climate of Sydney, asking you to provide a reliable source for your contributions, for example using the guide at Wikipedia:Citing sources. There had been multiple warnings for other disruption afterwards. The number of concerns voiced by other users above are disproportionate to the number of edits you have made so far, 48. At some point, a block from editing became necessary to prevent further addition of unsourced content, as asking for sources alone didn't seem to have had an effect.

In Special:Diff/1040212039/1041650207, you have replaced a date (28 Nov 2018) which is verifiably cited from the source at https://web.archive.org/web/20210104052730/http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/cdio/cvg/av?p_stn_num=066062&p_prim_element_index=0&p_comp_element_index=0&redraw=null&p_display_type=full_statistics_table&normals_years=1991-2020&tablesizebutt=normal by a date outside of the source's range. You have added the text "although thunderstorms are more common in the west" and removed a citation while replacing the text cited from it, without adding a citation for your replacement.

Where did you get the information from? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i understand now i will only ad info when i have a proper source. thanks for letting me know

That's okay, but I'd still like to see the source for the specific statements quoted above. Where did that information come from? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From personal experience but now i understand that's not allowed.

Okay, no worries then. It seems to have been a genuine misunderstanding. I'll unblock later today and don't object to anyone else doing so earlier. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:06, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:December 2018 Sydney Supercell Outbreak

Hello, Baptist1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:December 2018 Sydney Supercell Outbreak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Supercell, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You were blocked in the past for not providing sources. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Conservative Party leadership election (UK), you may be blocked from editing.

Some concerns

Whilst I understand that you didn't realise that you weren't in your user sandbox when you made these edits [1][2], you do need to be more careful. Many admins won't think twice about blocking you for that sort of edit, as they may just assume that your account was compromised (which is a rather large problem, as it makes it a lot harder to be unblocked).

Please, do not make the mistake of thinking you were in your sandbox again, especially on article related to politics (and especially Justin Trudeau^[1]), because, whilst I believe you, other editors/admins might be a lot less willing to believe you.

I know it seems a bit a rough, but I might as well just say this: As a general rule, getting unblocked from a second indefinite block is much harder than from a first one.

So it really isn't something you would want to risk happening.

Enough doom and gloom though. Time for a smiley face or three. 😃😃😃

If you need any help or advice or have any questions, you probably know where to go to find it, but you can always ask at my talkpage as well. (Because I think we may be in similar time zones) Cheerio and happy editing! Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 10:18, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ Explanatory note: There is a lot of vandalism to Trudeau-related topics, and so stuff like that tends to be viewed rather dimly. So (though we'd all prefer you didn't at all) if you are going to forget that you aren't in your sandbox, make sure that the words "Justin Trudeau" aren't anywhere on the page

[1] Explanatory note: There is a lot of vandalism to Trudeau-related topics, and so stuff like that tends to be viewed rather dimly. So (though we'd all prefer you didn't at all) if you are going to forget that you aren't in your sandbox, make sure that the words "Justin Trudeau" aren't anywhere on the page

[1]