User talk:Barisha2011

Hello, I'm 2601:188:1:AEA0:F9CF:CD1C:4CEC:AC6F. I noticed that you recently removed some content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:188:1:AEA0:F9CF:CD1C:4CEC:AC6F (talk) 22:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:4DE2:BECD:8051:3C87 (talk) 12:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Tanvir Hassan Zoha with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 20:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Tanvir Hassan Zoha, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. —MRD2014 T C 00:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Tanvir Hassan Zoha. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. —MRD2014 T C 00:53, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]