User talk:BatYisrael

Welcome!

Hello, BatYisrael, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 05:09, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Cantor Wultz

Reconsider yout attempt to delete. I'm still working on the page. However. Even as it is it is now it has sources and asserts notability. this young vicitm of a terrorist bombing is the cousin og Eric Cantor, a member of congress who who is being mentioned as a leading dandidate to run for Vice President on the Republican ticket. People will want to know who this boy is. and don't be so trigger-happy. Read articles before questioning their notability.BatYisrael (talk) 20:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)BatYisrael[reply]
Perhaps you could come back, read the article, and judge for yourself.BatYisrael (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2008 (UTC)BatYosrael[reply]

- I re-evaluated the article, and in its current state it looks a-ok. In the first version there was indeed a issue of notability, as the primary notability claim was a relationship to a politician. This falls under WP:INHERITED, which dictates that a person should be notable themselves, and that notability isnt established by being related to someone notable. I always like to explain this with the following example: "Mr X is the mailman of the sister of bill gates aunt's uncle!". As laughable as the example is, it does give an indication why notability isn't inherited. however, since you added third party sourcing about this victim it is more then clear that the boy is notable as himself. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 21:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also removed the CSD notice from your page as it is no longer valid. If you want to preserve it for archive purposes, feel free to restore it

Proposed deletion of Sherry Jones

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sherry Jones, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mayalld (talk) 15:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Denise Spellberg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Denise Spellberg, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JohnCD (talk) 15:28, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Denise Spellberg

An article that you have been involved in editing, Denise Spellberg, has been listed for deletion. I have included in this nomination the article Sherry Jones. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise Spellberg. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JohnCD (talk) 16:01, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Jewel of Medina

There's no need to add a hangon tag to a page that hasn't got a speedy request on it. In mine, and at least one other editors, opinion this page is not suitable for speedy delete so I very much doubt it will be. Dpmuk (talk) 16:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sherry Jones has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' (link(s): http://sherryjones.blogspot.com/) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 16:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Sherry Jones. Thank you. Please stop trying to add the blog link Mayalld (talk) 15:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel Cantor Wultz

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Daniel Cantor Wultz, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Crusio (talk) 09:28, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Daniel Cantor Wultz

I have nominated Daniel Cantor Wultz, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Cantor Wultz. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. CalendarWatcher (talk) 22:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Alisa Flatow

I have nominated Alisa Flatow, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alisa Flatow. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Enigma ^message 05:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC) Enigma ^message 05:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asaf Romirowsky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asaf Romirowsky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asaf Romirowsky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ImTheIP (talk) 15:24, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]