User talk:Bdve/Archive3

I noticed one of my edits was removed. Just wondering why thats all.

Best regards

email sent - sorry for any offense caused.

Thanks for your hard work on wikipedia

i sent you an email did you get it? i cant get to grips with this "messaging system" whereby the only way i can work out how to communicate with one another is by editing talk pages. There must be an easier way but i cant figure it out.

RE: John Cena

Complete accident, my TW has been on the fritz lately, must've opened the wrong talk, I rv'ed to your edit, your edit was not the vandalism, ugh. I'm going to bed. Bmg916^Speak_Sign 03:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KBW

Hey , sorry for the mess up on the John Cena page. I just thought I would add that piece of info with the reference, but sorry. Was it wrong? -- KBW1 22:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Well thanks, I'll try to learn from that mistake. -- KBW1 02:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Banks/MVP/Alvin Burke Jr./Hassan Assad

Now that the mystery of his real name has been solved and how the Hassan Assad name came about should the article be moved? Antonio Banks has been shown to be his indy ring name while Alvin Burke has been shown to be his birth name while Hassan Assad has been shown to be a known alias he uses. Speculative extrapolation by that sequence implies to me it's possible Hassan Assad is his current "real name" and at some point he converted to the Nation of Islam changing his name in the process. –– Lid^(Talk) 05:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did include speculative in there on purpose as we know we can't move the article based on speculation, hence why I've helped moving it to his birth name and fix all the redirects while you weren't online. I was simply stating to me it seems that under the name changing laws of the US his name could be Hassan Assad for all intents and purposes. –– Lid^(Talk) 14:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We're in a conundrum: Observer first announces, correctly, his name and now the basis for Hassan Assad is not reliable. The Observer isn't 100% unreliable however it isn't also a random fan site that posts every single piece of information they are sent (for that see the Torch). –– Lid^(Talk) 16:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:GaryAlbright.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GaryAlbright.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:RMS3DVD.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:RMS3DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Cena

Would this be a WP:RS for the name? [1] ExtraDry 13:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A reliable source has been found. Bmg916^Speak 17:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cryme Time

So what day did they receive a title shot for survivor series anyway? Mshake3 04:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that. So a), it has nothing to do with Survivor Series, and b), the title match was never actually scheduled for a PPV. Mshake3 14:10, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Vengeance

What was the point of this edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WWE_Vengeance&diff=138630661&oldid=138626763 ? TJ Spyke 21:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't fixing redirects. They were originally correct, and then some IP vandalized the page by removing them (and thus creating the redirects). TJ Spyke 23:22, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cena-2006.jpg

I got this image from Flickr.com and I cropped it!!! And from previous images; how come they come out blurry? Do you know why? ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 24:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know!!! ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Benoit

Just wondering about your most recent comment on WP:PW, should we be keeping "The Late.." part or should we be removing it? Cheers --SteelersFan UK06 15:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A humble reply

I used Google Books to look for loser leaves town matches mentioned in the book. As far as I could tell, Foley only mentioned being in them (on three separate occasions actually) but never really explained exactly what they were or anything. He merely mentioned he was going to be in one and then he was going to move to another promotion. I'm not sure we can use that as a citation, since he didn't specify a cause and effect relationship. I'm in the middle of reading a few other wrestling related books, and I'll be on the lookout for descriptions of match types for you. Nikki311 02:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Cena GA Review

I placed the review on hold. Info is on the articles talk page. - T-75|talk|contribs 22:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replying on the Cena talk page works that way everyone can see what's going on (they probably wouldn't look here). Just an FYI, I'm not as picky as others, but I know from my own experience that there are a lot of anti-wrestling editors on wikipedia, so I am a little more picky on the wrestling related articles because I don't want someone to turn around and delist them. I'm flexible in the process and really just want to see articles get improved to GA status, I'd rather not fail them. - T-75|talk|contribs 23:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:OutlawRonBass.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:OutlawRonBass.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Match type prods

I know that you have been working on the List of professional wrestling match types and have been prod'ing some of the individual articles (and rightfully so because most of the match types are undeserving of their own articles). This is a heads up...I just prod'ed Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal. I don't know how much you know about this type/kind of match, but it was used a couple of times in WCW and was used in WWE as Raw Roulette. Maybe some of the info should be merged into the LoPWMT? Maybe just mention the Jake Roberts/Sting match up and a brief mention of how Eric Bischoff revived the idea as Raw Roulette would suffice. I remember reading about it in one of Foley's books, so I'll try and get a citation for it...if you decide it's worthy of merging. Let me know. Nikki311 03:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation page style

Thanks for helping out on Precious (disambiguation), but please see the Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) before removing the cleanup tag. In particular, try to avoid:

piping disambiguation links to hide the parentheses
linking words other than the term being disambiguated

Thank you. —Piet Delport 04:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image in Brian Adams article

Hi Bdve - as part of the reason the GA for Brian Adams (wrestler) failed was because the image [[Image:Demolition 3.jpg]] does not have a fair use rationale, since you uploaded it you're really the only one that can fill it out. Could you please add the following section to the image page in the appropriate place with the appropriate information filled in??

=== Fair use for [[Brian Adams (wrestler)]] === {{Non-free media rationale |Description= |Source= |Portion= |Low_resolution= |Purpose= |Replaceability= }}

If you're in doubt about using the tag please refer to Wikipedia:Image description page#Fair use rationale for more information. Without this information the Brian Adams article will never reach "GA" Status - thank you in advance. MPJ-DK 10:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Fixing Redirects'

I wasn't aware of that policy since it seems a little counterintuitive. There weren't many links to the WWF left, so I figured I'd clean them out. I understand why I shouldn't do that kind of thing thanks to Wikipedia:Tools/Navigation_popups/About_fixing_redirects and Wikipedia:Redirect#Don't fix links to redirects that aren't broken. I'll only make that kind of change now if I'm editing the article for other reasons as well. But doesn't reverting my edits cause unnecessary server work as well? Or were you thinking WWF would be a possible future article? DrWarpMind 17:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Big Daddy V

Big Daddy V's first match in ECW is not notable? I would think that a first match anywhere would be notable especially with a new gimmick Jdblundell 21:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ECW?

With all due respect, I have no idea what you're talking about, about reading the edit summaries backwards. Care to elaborate? All I did was change "Tuesday Night Raw on SciFi" to "ECW on SciFi". Th 2005 00:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. I understand. Th 2005 12:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Longkeys

I noticed one of my edits was removed. Just wondering why thats all.

Best regards—Preceding unsigned comment added by Longkeys (talk • contribs)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Badasstaker.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Badasstaker.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:50, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Cena overlinking

Hi Bdve, I noticed you reverted an edit of mine yesterday. The reason I removed several wikilinks is because of this paragraph here. Thanks. Davnel03 14:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. The reason I brought that up is because of this mentioned by a user at another FAC. That's why I unlinked lots of things so that I don't get another user asking me to unlink stuff. Davnel03 14:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Umaga

Hey Bdve, just wondering why my edit on this page was reverted? I figured that I was just updating the Umaga page with recent information. Do I need to reference what I put on the page or something? Thanks. Journo:In:Making 00:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

McMahon image reply

Did I do that? My bad. -- bulletproof ^3:16 23:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PennRadio.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PennRadio.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ((1 == 2) ? (('Stop') : ('Go')) 20:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pacman Jones

Not that it matters because no matter what that sentence said it was subjective, Pacman is not slightly above average. I hate the guy, but as far as cover corners go he is fantastic.►Chris Nelson 16:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Is there some way I can report repeat vandals? There's one who keeps adding nonsourced POV stuff to Hulk Hogan's, just an IP, no user. I checked into his other edits and his talk section and he's been banned for a day before for the same sort of vandalism to articles ranging from a Prussian king to Hulk Hogan. I was just wondering what there is to do with a repeat vandal, aside from continually reverting his edits. Kudos (also, if you could get back to me on my talk page that'd be great) Th 2005 09:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. Where do I find these templates? Th 2005 11:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Headings

Hi,

Regards the wrestling list, links in headings should be avoided. That's why I've been removing the links. The link should be embedded in the text of the section itself. Thanks, WLU 18:53, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this and this edit. Probably a bit clearer than 'the wrestling list' :) WLU 19:52, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Funny every time

I noticed you had to revert a false death date on Eddie Fatu and thought I'd drop by and tell you to keep an eye on Orton's page as well. There's a false rumour going around about an Orton suicide attempt. I haven't seen anyone try to edit anything about it into his article, but better safe than sorry eh? Th 2005 14:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Random smile

Zenlax has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Zenlax 1:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Newsradio12.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Newsradio12.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Newsradio3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Newsradio3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Newsradio4.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Newsradio4.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Newsradio5.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Newsradio5.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December to Dismember (2006)

Would you mind having a look over December to Dismember (2006), as the article is currently up for peer review. I'd be grateful for any thoughts you might have on the article, and that you leave your thoughts on the article here. Many thanks in advance, Davnel03 18:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Extreme Championship Wrestling (WWE)

I removed a template warning you got regarding your removal of forum like comments from this talk page, because you were right in doing so. I also warned the user about leaving forum type discussion on the article's talk page. Bmg916^Speak 14:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you?

Like to sign my signature book? Zenlax ^Talk ^{Contributions} ^Signatures 20:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cyber Sunday 2007

Do you really think that wall graphics are worth noting? It seems like fluff to me as it really has nothing to do with the event itself. TJ Spyke 22:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of WCW World Heavyweight Champions

Thanks for your help with the picture on this article. I had tried to find one somewhere on Wikipedia, so I appreciate you pointing me in the right direction.

The article has been nominated for Featured List status. If you would like, you're welcome to look over the article and give your opinion on the Featured List candidate page (accessed through the discussion page). Thanks again. GaryColemanFan 22:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== Kristal ==--Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 22:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to make this clear. If six months from now, WWE never mentions the release, and Kristal herselve never says anything (probably because she's out of the wrestling business), does that mean we still won't be able to mention the release? Mshake3 21:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your warning

This warning, on me as an IP when I could not log in for making this edit makes no sense. There was nothing non constructive or sandbox about it. In fact, what you reverted to was such a horrible mess of an article-with broken links and incorrect and improper cites-compared to the changes I made I wonder if you even read it.«»bd(^talk _stalk) 22:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I expected the edit to be one of those dual edits, where an IP adds vandalism to a page, and then edits it another time causing the diff to show only a big mess of edits. In all due honesty, i did not read it, and i rarely do when reverting an article. I mainly scan for vandalism signals (Which, most times, are quite obvious). In this case the entire page looked lite a full vandalism, causing me to issue an (incorrect) revert.

Sorry for this though, as i should have given the article a better look afterwards. Its something i tend to forget every now and them, and as you can see its something that sometimes plays up a little bit. For what its worth: I restored your last version, removed the IP level warning, and ill promise you ill be even more carefull in the future :) --Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 22:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shad

I understand you removing the WWE Cryme tyme info about me but can you leave everything ells the way it is. It’s all true and I have tried to give you guy the references needed to find the info.Bkbeast13 19:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and clean it up (rm some of the Cryme Tyme stuff if you want, he's okay with that, he understands that Cryme Tyme has a separate article). I was going ask you or another establish editor to copy edit it for grammar and clarity anyway. Bmg916^Speak 20:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IYH 1

I've replied to your points HERE. Your points were two very good issues that would of probably been brought up in the FAC. Please comment back at the link. Thanks, Dav nel 03 20:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kofi Kingston

Ive been noticing how you are removing the Jamaican flag Icon from Kofi Kingston's article in his infobox, why are you doing this? All professional wrestlers have a flag of their country they were born in! Also Joey Styles might have said that he is the only Jamaican superstar but it is also on ECW.com or ECW.com. Which is more sourceful than words said by a commentator.--TrUcO9311 (talk) 21:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Cena image linking

Yesterday you said "ViewImages does not allow direct linking to their files" so how come the very first image of him writing is a direct link? That one has been there for months and you never took that one down, it's still there. Writer1400 (talk) 12:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Oh you mean the website "viewimages", sorry, I thought you meant you can't have a direct link to viewing images. How come we can't use viewimages though? Writer1400 (talk) 14:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hey, I left you a question on the Cena talk page, please reply because i'm really confused about this. Writer1400 (talk) 17:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all your hardwork on reverting vandalism. Speed CG ^Talk 17:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

John Cena

We need to keep a constant eye on the page. It seems the user isn’t the only one adding the engagement note. -- bulletproof ^3:16 01:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That would actually work. -- bulletproof ^3:16 22:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused

Good Morning. I'm a little confused as to why you undid my archiving of John Cena's talk page? Stormin' Foreman ^{Got something to say?} 16:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archival

Would you like me to archive your talk page?--TrU Co ⁹31¹ 04:08, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Cena page

[2] This comment is assuming that you didn't have a problem with my edit from yesterday: Please be more careful not revert other editors edits in the midst of a content dispute you have with another editor. Reverting should be done more carefully, and unless your straight reverting to the latest edit only once, you should use the undo button provided in the history page if your undoing a single editor. If undo is impossible to perform, I expect you to revert and put back things that were not what disagreed with (i.e. typo fixes, link fixes, etc.) — Save_Us † 21:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

02:04, 20 February 2008 [3] You make changes to the article
20:12, 20 February 2008 [4] I make an edit to the article
21:51, 20 February 2008 [5] Someone reverted your edits
14:22, 21 February 2008 [6] You revert him and me because you reverted back to your old revision at 02:04, 20 February 2008.

That is what I meant. Don't revert me while your reverting someone else. — Save_Us † 23:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know I can fix it with 0 problems, it's just frustrating to have to go behind every edit and make sure someone didn't accidently revert me in the process of making a revert of someone else. I edit at a pretty fast rate, I just dont like seeing mistakes happen like that =/ No hard feelings, — Save_Us † 23:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

confermation

I saw on recent changes thattyou made a article about some top singles with on link . It was a useless list and not for wikipedia.Excitinginterception7 (talk) 00:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

blanking

You also blanked the page od some pure personal attack page mage by someone else you should have reverted it to nothing not blanked it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Excitinginterception7 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]