User talk:Beisenbe

I suggest that the following three sentences be added to the section on Publications.

"A search of EconLit shows that Mr. Bernstein has not yet published an article in a peer-reviewed economics journal. EconLit, the American Economic Association's electronic database, is the world's foremost source of references to economic literature. The database contains more than 1.1 million records from 1886-present."

I think this is relevant information because, although Mr. Bernstein is often listed as an economist, his Ph.D. is in Social Welfare. He has not published an article in a peer-reviewed economics journal and, thus, is not recognized as an economist by professional economists. His expertise is in social policy -- not scientific research in economics.

Let me know what you think.

Ebw343 (talk) 18:46, 1 June 2011 (UTC) ebw343[reply]

March 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kirchhoff's circuit laws, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 21:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The central issue is why is there no derivation given of Kirchhoff's current law?

The fact is that the design of circuits on the nanosecond time scale is done with Kirchhoff's current law. References below. At that time scale, the flow of charge (e.g., the flow of electrons in a typical circuit) is not equal in a series system of two terminal components.

Why? Because the Maxwell Ampere law says that an additional term Maxwell's displacement current epsilon_0 partial E/partial t is involved.

This is proved in what I submitted in a few lines of elementary vector calculus.

Circuit design references include

Horowitz, P. and W. Hill (2015). The Art of Electronics, Cambridge University Press.

Cressler, J. D. (2005). Silicon Heterostructure Handbook: Materials, Fabrication, Devices, Circuits and Applications of SiGe and Si Strained-Layer Epitaxy. Boca Raton, FL, CRC

Gray, P. R., P. J. Hurst, S. H. Lewis and R. G. Meyer (2001). Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits. New York, John Wiley.

Lienig, J. and J. Scheible (2020). Fundamentals of layout design for electronic circuits, Springer Nature.

Muller, R. S., M. Chan and T. I. Kamins (2003). Device Electronics For Integrated Circuits, 3rd Ed, Wiley India Pvt. Limited.

Rashid, M. H., K. Afridi, J. M. Alonso, I. Batarseh, A. Bryant, J. Carrasco, L. Chaar, A. K. Chattopadhyay, M. Chow and H. S. H. Chung (2010). Power Electronics Handbook: Devices, Circuits and Applications, Elsevier Science. Beisenbe (talk) 11:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your remark ("This is proved in what I submitted in a few lines of elementary vector calculus"): see wp:NOR, wp:SYNT and wp:CALC. If the claim itself and the derivation do not appear in the relevant literature, it is not for Wikipedia—by design. - DVdm (talk) 11:47, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Maxwell's equations, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Hi. I just wanted to let you know that the original research exclusion (WP:OR) is very broad and includes such things as obvious (to you) extensions of well-known equations. When you show something that is obvious to you, you may have may a mistake. Wikipedia avoids mistakes by relying on reliable sources (WP:RS). Constant314 (talk) 21:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kirchhoff's circuit laws, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your content has been removed four times from two articles because the sources are considered unreliable. Please seek a consensus on the talk page of one of these articles before continuing. Kirchoff's circuit laws is probably the most appropriate article. Constant314 (talk) 08:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]