User talk:Belovedsarniacherie

Welcome to Wiki

A suggestion if I may.You might want to be a little more thorough in your researching. Elements of your addition to the Sir Isaac Brock page weren't borne out by even a cursory check ie. claiming that the sculpture was announced nationally when in fact the only media announcement (thus far at least)is in the Whig. Also although the artist may describe his work is "forensic", given the paucity of sources for him to draw upon as part of his "reconstruction", of necessity his work can at best be interpretive and not meet threshold of proof that goes along with the conventional understanding and use of the word forensic. HTH User:Natty10000 ^{[Stop me before I edit again!]} 16:04, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am guessing you have your Ph.D in Forensics and know of the work performed?

In response to your feedback

I just read what she wrote and I don't see anything rude about it.

Abigail was here :D _{Talk to Me.} _{Email Me.} 16:08, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Christian Cardell Corbet. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 02:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Christian Cardell Corbet, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. A valid reason was not given as this is still an issue. Discuss this on the article talk page but do not remove the template freshacconci talktalk 03:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

What articles are you having trouble accessing? Thank you for your feedback and thank you for your contributions! For more help on getting started, please look at Help desk and the help pages.

Cheers,
Riley Huntley (talk) No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 04:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Belovedsarniacherie, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! heather walls (talk) 05:18, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Your recent edits to Christian Cardell Corbet could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 22:42, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:13, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]