User talk:Benjaminzygs

Boing!

Block from edit

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benjaminzygs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Old year ago of block

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benjaminzygs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that Wikipedia is not a toy to play with but to be fact the block is no longer needed,I understand why I am blocked for vandalism which is not right and I should learn from right and wrong. I will not contuine the vandalism and I will make useful contribution instead. Thank you for your understanding. Benjaminzygs (talk) 15:13, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ben2719941/Archive. Making block match those accounts. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:46, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What constructive contributions do you wish to make? 331dot (talk)

08:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Just updating the potbelleez pages instead because my behaviour from last year is unacceptable Benjaminzygs (talk) 18:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Last year? You were blocked 12 years ago. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:38, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to go back to normal, I happy to be involved in investigation or in administration noticeboard. Benjaminzygs (talk) 18:14, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up

Anyway, from whichever account is the first, you need to ask Arbitration Committee for their clearance to seek unbanning from the Community at WP:AN. Their email is arbcom-enwikimedia.org. You will need to address the WP:CIR concerns and all those socks. (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ben2719941/Archive))Cheers, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]