User talk:Bensondaled

USDS Syndrome

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article USDS Syndrome, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ... discospinster _talk 00:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

(Creator): The condition, although maybe never heard of, is present in many teens. Due to the lack of research on the topic, there is not much else to say about it besides wht it written, but it has been concluded as a theory just like any other theory, and it should be recognized. If more research is done, the results will be added.

• I suggest you read WP:OR "Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought" and WP:MADEUP "Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day" --Ron Ritzman 03:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of USDS Syndrome

I've nominated USDS Syndrome, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that USDS Syndrome satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USDS Syndrome and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of USDS Syndrome during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 02:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism Warning

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Rashi. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Zsero 06:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lupe:undone

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lupe:undone, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Orange Mike | Talk 13:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Nestea Theorem

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Nestea Theorem, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Drmies (talk) 04:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with The Nestea Theorem. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Exor674 (talk) 05:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ricky's Room

The article Ricky's Room has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no establishment of notability, appears to be created by Degrassi fans, it has no references, the preceded/followed places it in the Degrassi universe, which is incorrect, and the 1999 date would place it after Degrassi High.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 117Avenue (talk) 06:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)