User talk:Betaquest1

Teddy Harris

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Teddy Harris, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.beechwoodnet.com/Bio.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Teddy Harris, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.beechwoodnet.com/Bio.html. As a copyright violation, Teddy Harris appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Teddy Harris has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Teddy Harris and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Teddy Harris with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Teddy Harris.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Evb-wiki (talk) 14:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Teddy Harris. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. --Evb-wiki (talk) 14:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Teddy Harris. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, as you did with Teddy Harris, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:31, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Infobox Mayor Pro Tem

A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox Mayor Pro Tem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. ---- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:32, 24 August 2008 (UTC) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:32, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Teddy Harris

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Teddy Harris, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

I removed the Speedy template and removed copyvio, but have proposed it for deletion, as city councilors aren't usually notable - even if they are the mayor pro tem. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 06:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Teddy Harris

An article that you have been involved in editing, Teddy Harris, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teddy Harris. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Evb-wiki (talk) 14:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Betaquest1 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is obvious that you used the account User:Farstar1 to show broader support for Teddy Harris, and so I have blocked that account indefinitely. You cannot use alternate accounts in this fashion, and any recurrence will likely lead to all related accounts being blocked. Kevin (talk) 02:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]