User talk:Beyond12

Beyond12, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Beyond12! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

×

Revision[edit]

Hello,

Thanks for joining Wikipedia. You had reverted an edit in this revision without citing an accepted source on Wikipedia (WP:NOR). If you have any source in contradiction with the source of the original edit, please remember to mention when undoing an edit. If you are, by any chance, has a close connection to the subject in this article, please note Wikipedia’s policy on WP:SPA and WP:COI.

alexlur 08:34, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at National Citizens Alliance. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 23:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot continue to blank the majority of content and sources from National Citizens Alliance. Use the article talk page to discuss the changes you would like to make and get consensus for them. If you continue to edit war to disruptively strip the content you personally don't agree with, you will be blocked from editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:10, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:12, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:23, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at National Citizens Alliance. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. slakr^\ talk / 22:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Beyond12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25431 was submitted on Jun 01, 2019 16:47:01. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:47, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reblocked for 1 week following block evasion with User:Webventures. Just Chilling (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beyond12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wiki Page National Citizens Alliance has been vandalized, corrupted with misinformation, inaccurate information; I updated the page to simplified corrected version; political operatives continue to sabotage the site

Decline reason:

It hasn't been vandalized. Please see WP:NOTVAND. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:09, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I moved your request to the bottom of this page. Please add new content at the very bottom by using the edit link above the page title, which lets you edit the whole page instead of a section. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 04:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reblocked for 1 month following block evasion with User:Hrechka. Just Chilling (talk) 19:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]