Jump to content

User talk:Bhuvanhungund01

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anupam Tripathi page

[edit]

I know you just joined Wikipedia but you can't just do whatever on here. Wikipedia has guidelines that must be followed or else you can get blocked from here. Just note not any image can be used unless it has a proper license. My advice to you would be take the time to learn and read about Wikipedia's guidelines if your serious about editing. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 10:15, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for what I have done so far but promise not to do it further. Bhuvanhungund01 (talk) 11:31, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bhuvanhungund01, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Bhuvanhungund01! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Article:Triggered Insaan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Wrong "namespace", draft exists, promotional external links to his channel.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kleuske (talk) 13:27, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Bhuvanhungund01. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bhuvanhungund01. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bhuvanhungund01|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 13:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 14:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]