User talk:Bishopfinger

Bishopfinger, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bishopfinger! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bop34 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Adding WP:FICTREF and promotional material

At Reformed Old Catholic Church you have added WP:FICTREF. Most claims on Wikipedia must be sourced by an inline reference as per WP:V. You have also added an unsourced controversial claim and used a promotional tone. Veverve (talk) 16:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback we will amend in due course Bishopfinger (talk) 22:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Veverve, you may be blocked from editing. Veverve (talk) 17:08, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Veverve. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Reformed Old Catholic Church, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I have already explained in my edit summaries that those information were nowhere to be found in the sources; you did not justify adding those information back, and you also added new unsourced information. Wikipedia is WP:NOTWEBHOST. Please take it to the discussion page if you disagree with my removal of content on this article. Veverve (talk) 21:40, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Bishopfinger vandalises my user page, refuses to talk, adds unsourced content, (meat)puppet master regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 22:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 22:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Reformed Old Catholic Church) for article disruption.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 22:20, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 21:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

• Blocked for harassment/personal attacks and disruption, from this account, two IPs, and from User:Scottishalba. You can't do that. Drmies (talk) 21:11, 30 December 2021 (UTC)