User talk:Bkissin Free

Welcome!

Hi Bkissin Free! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 19:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiaundra Jackson (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kiaundra Jackson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kiaundra Jackson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bkissin Free! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Laurie Robinson (lawyer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Laurie Robinson (lawyer). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SkyWay Group

Hi Bkissin Free! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.

The edit(s) you have restored have multiple issues: 1. They are removing sources without any reason or explanation, such as the article by italpost. Please do not remove sources without giving an explanation. 2. Not every unknown information about a company has to be displayed as "undisclosed" in the information box. This is especially true for inapplicable entries such as "parent" (there is no parent company in this case). 3. English language dates are generally written as "In July 2016" not "In July of 2016".

I have therefore reverted the edits. Please do not reinstate the edits as long as these issues still exist and there is no consensus on the change. Feel free to partially reinstate those parts that are not affected by the issues above. Thank you. --Wan Shi Tong (talk) 13:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your continued vandalism of this page is abhorrent and I have asked the admin to ban you. Cease your activities immediately. Reversal of edits must have merit & none of your do.Bkissin Free (talk) 13:36, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Wan Shi Tong (talk) 14:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bkissin Free (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not attacking anyone! The user is vandalizing a page and you are blaming me? This is outrageous Bkissin Free (talk) 15:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See comment by Lavalizard101 below. PhilKnight (talk) 16:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(uninvolved non-admin comment) the edits you are reverting are not vandalism and you are personally attacking them, you called them a a "shill". Lavalizard101 (talk) 16:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For a variety of reasons which are specified in the block log, this block is now indefinite. See WP:GAB for possible appeal avenues. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laurie Robinson (lawyer) (April 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MurielMary was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Rejecting as created by an account which has been found to be a sockpuppet.

MurielMary (talk) 10:10, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]