User talk:BlaineCreek

Welcome!

Hello, BlaineCreek! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SkyWarrior 01:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2023

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Politialguru. Thank you. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 16:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, These accusations of sockpuppeting made against me are false. I would like to continue to edit Wikipedia but I will of course stop should my edits be undone. I would be glad if an administrator could investigate and report back with evidence which will clear my name concerning these allegations. Thank you BlaineCreek (talk) 19:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I did a global revert and omitted to uncheck this edit. Does nothing to detract from you being a block-evading sock mind... Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve posted on the admin notice board asking them to look into this issue. I would like to be able to edit freely regardless of your false allegations. BlaineCreek (talk) 20:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BlaineCreek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Mistaken identity - false allegations have been made I am a banned user, however this is not the case and my appeals have been ignored. BlaineCreek (talk) 21:31, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is as blatant as a WP:DUCK I have seen. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BlaineCreek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Appeal to common sense and reason. It seems my previous request for an unblock was denied. As far as I can tell the evidence that I am a banned user is based on the fact I have edited similar (popular) pages which is completely circumstantial. Are there any tools available to me or admins to dispute these false allegations and be unblocked? Thank you BlaineCreek (talk) 21:38, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

CU confirmed sock puppetry $Salvio giuliano$ 21:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.