User talk:Bluee Bell


Main	Talk	Subpage	Userbox	Image	Contribution	Awards	E-mail

Bluee Bell, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bluee Bell! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

23:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Internshala

Hello Bluee Bell, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Internshala, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: If an admin has previously declined to speedy delete the article, it should not be tagged again but instead be taken to WP:AFD. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. So Why 15:45, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SoWhy: Thanks for providing a helpful link about speedy deletion. but, I have a little question is What happens to Internshala. As you can see this page doesn't accept wikipedia general notability guidelines and no any special achievement to this company which indicate company importance. Thanks again --Bluee Bell (talk) 06:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to start a deletion discussion about it.The last discussion was only closed for procedural reasons because the editor who created it was banned and thus not allowed to edit anywhere. Regards So Why 07:15, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Raaj Tilak (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bluee Bell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey, I am also shocked to see that Raaj Tilak and my contributions is approximately same as seen in this page. but, It doesn't mean that I am creator of Raaj Tilak account. Assume two users are making same contributions with some time its means one person is using more than one account, wow great. Please check again my contributions and unblock me. Thanks Bluee Bell (talk) 14:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser backs up the conclusion that lead to the block. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:11, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.