User talk:Boaqua

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Boaqua! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Marek.69 ^talk 00:05, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for warm welcome! Boaqua (talk) 08:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Please make sure to respect copyright.--S Philbrick (Talk) 12:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ASAN Visa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ASAN Visa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/easy-travel-to-azerbaijan-300379894.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉ 11:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boaqua, changing a couple words really is not enough to get us free of copyright laws. Even if most words are different but the sentence/paragraph structure is the same it could be a problem. As the note above says, the source can not be a "source of sentences." I'd encourage you to start again, and let me know if you want me to recover any of the boilerplate (infobox/categories/etc). But if you would like to do this you really need to start the text/etc from scratch. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ASAN Visa logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ASAN Visa logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Hi your edition has source Modern Sciences (talk) 00:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Vandalism

Stop vandalism in Wiki articles if It repeated i Will report in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard Modern Sciences (talk) 02:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Modern Sciences (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again Vandalism

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Modern Sciences (talk) 23:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Azerbijan

Azerbijan created by Russian 1918 Modern Sciences (talk) 01:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

APA

Please stop trying to get more APA references into the Azerbaijani constitutional referendum, 2016. Do you have a conflict of interest with this organisation? Number 5 7 09:26, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Armenian Genocide denial. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dr. K. 23:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice about Armenia and Azerbaijan

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--Dr. K. 18:13, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Boaqua reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: ). Thank you. Dr. K. 11:25, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Boaqua. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]