User talk:Bootpalish

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bootpalish. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Epicgenius (talk) 20:41, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Asia Pacific Property Awards

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Asia Pacific Property Awards, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://propertyawards.net/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Experion Developers

Hello Bootpalish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Experion Developers for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 15:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Experion Developers

Hi, Bootpalish. Thanks for interacting with me on this. I tagged your article for speedy deletion based on criterion A7, "No indication of importance", and at least one moderator must have agreed with me, as I cannot delete articles myself. It is not enough that a company merely exist to enable it to have a Wikipedia page, it must be notable, and notable according to Wikipedia standards. If you want articles on Indian commercial endeavours to succeed on Wikipedia, you need to do two things:

Explain the reason why the company is notable in the first few sentences, but using facts, not advertising hype. For example, "XYZ is an Indian real estate company, known for selling the Taj Mahal in 2012" (a fact), not "XYZ is the leading Indian real estate company, known to one and all as the best" (hype).
Back up your claims to notability with "reliable sources that are independent of the subject", such as newspapers and journals. The company website is no good here because it is not independent, blogs and tweets and facebook pages are no good here because they are not reliable.

If you're unable to find independent, reliable sources, it's generally because the company is not notable in the Wikipedia sense.

Here is the first paragraph of your article on Experion: "Experion Developers is a fully FDI funded real estate development company which is a fully owned subsidiary by Experion Holdings Pte Ltd, Singapore. Experio the real estate investing arm of the $2.5 billion AT Holdings group of companies." What in that suggests notability? When I google Experion, I find no press coverage, but only their own website and websites of their properties. I have to conclude that Experion is just another real estate development company.

I sympathize with your desire to let the world know more about Indian companies. But, unless they are notable, Wikipedia is not the place to do that. Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, particularly the sections Wikipedia is not a means of promotion and Wikipedia is not a directory.

Hope this helps. ubiquity (talk) 15:06, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of InsuringIndia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InsuringIndia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InsuringIndia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. M4DU7 (talk) 05:47, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaBetaGamma were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bootpalish/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bootpalish! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]