User talk:BrettSlezak

Welcome!

Hello, BrettSlezak, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! BrettSlezak, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Village Enterprise (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Village Enterprise and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Village Enterprise has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Village Enterprise. Thanks! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Village Enterprise (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Your lead section's very first sentences are attributed to poor sources (cf. footnotes 1 and 2). This is not acceptable and presents a strong decline reason. Now, please be aware that you should have a general look at your references, i.e., whether the cited sources are really high-quality sources. Asses your sources! Check whether they are citable. Something else of note is, for example, footnote 3: It refers to a BBC radio programme, almost 18 minutes in length. In general, citing such sources is acceptable, however, I strongly recommend you add timestamps to your citation. It makes it a lot easier to asses the source. In fact, I have spent 5 minutes listening at double speed, only to figure that the important pieces of information are found at ca. 05:30 (list of countries) and ca. 09:30 ("Village Enterprise has helped nearly 300,000 people"). Despite the fact that the BBC programme is largely based on interviews, I would deem it source contributing towards (because I reckon it is safe to say that it has gone through an editorial process at BBC). In other contexts, however, interviews may not contribute towards notability. Best, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:43, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review, @Johannes Maximilian. I've added timestamps to the BBC radio program as you've suggested. I've also re-attributed footnote 1 to the BBC program (note that previously it was attributed to Marketplace, a program that runs on NPR). I've removed the sentence that required footnote two about Village Enterprise's mission. That seemed to be causing problems as a primary source.

Apologies for these sourcing errors, I had looked at some other pages and saw it was common for companies and nonprofits to often have a primary source as one of their first ones to include the mission statement, including Apple Inc., Facebook, Amazon (company) — as well as other nonprofits similar to Village Enterprise such as One Acre Fund, The BOMA Project, Charity: Water.

Would you be able to review the page again now that these edits have been made? I really appreciate you reviewing the page and providing feedback. BrettSlezak (talk) 18:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Village Enterprise and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:43, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Village Enterprise has been accepted

Village Enterprise, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 15:26, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]