User talk:Bucko503

Ways to improve Rideau brothers

Hello, Bucko503,

Thank you for creating Rideau brothers.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Reads a bit like a news release. Can you make it a little less sensationalist?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CollectiveSolidarity}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 16:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Rob49

Hello, Bucko503, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Zppix, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Rob49, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob49.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Zppix}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 18:14, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rob49 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rob49, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob49 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Algiers

Do not revert copyright violations back in. If you do that again, you will be blocked. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 22:17, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My reasons for reverting the infringement was because i removed the copyrighted material in the article. My intent was not to disrupt but to improve the article. Bucko503 (talk) 11:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hardy Boys (gang), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Content requires citations. Please do not add unsourced material. Read WP:CITE, WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:V. // Timothy :: talk 17:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hardy Boys (gang) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hardy Boys (gang), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flordiapj9.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flordiapj9.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 18:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to search results

This evening I found myself cleaning up citations you added at D-Block Boys that consisted of a link to a search result output by a proprietary database. That is not a source: the source is the newspaper article, not the output of the search result, and the output of the search result is not stable nor usable by almost anyone to access the source. I have not checked whether you have been doing this steadily for a long time, or if (I hope) you did it for a little while and at some point figured out the correct thing to do instead. In case of the former, you can see from my edit what sort of minimal information is necessary to include to make it a real citation. There is one of your links there that I was not able to fix (the one you added in this edit); I would appreciate it if you would add the necessary bibliographic details. Thanks, JBL (talk) 00:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hardy Boys (gang)

Hello, Bucko503. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hardy Boys (gang), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hardy Boys (gang) (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Changes have not been made since article's draftification. Wikipedia is not a database or collection of indiscriminate information. Most of the timeline is unreferenced, and half of the references are search results.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hardy Boys (gang) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bucko503! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kilo G (Hip-hop artist)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kilo G (Hip-hop artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilo G. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 16:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fischer Projects, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gretna. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]