User talk:BudMann9

Some links I thought useful:

Also: Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have or just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Jane Kaczmarek wins[edit]

If you find it so important to state she never won...then edit the Julia Duffy and Angela Lansbury pages, as they both had 0 records when it came to Emmys as well. For there is a need for uniformity. I personally find it not necessary, since it is implied she did not win since it stated she was merely nominated. Besides, other sites never highlight losses, but merely promote winnings. Thanks for your contributions though Small5th 21:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

haha i wish Angela Lansbury did win, but she has the saddest record in Oscars and Emmys. Lost the Emmy 11 times and Oscars 3 times. You can verify on the site actually...the View interviewed her about it But thank you though! Small5th 00:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC) c) 12:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Classmates vs. "classmates"[edit]

I'd like to direct your attention towards Talk:Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?#Classmates vs. "classmates" – I believe I have relayed both sides of the debate, but invite you to comment or participate in it so that we can come to a conclusion about which to use without the need for edit warring. Thanks. —Daniel Vandersluis^(talk) 14:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Singular "They"[edit]

Read up on the now accepted usage of singular they - particularly see: Singular they#Modern reactions. "They" is an accepted form of singular when the gender is undetermined. Just like the word "you" was originally only for plural, "thee" was the singular. Today, "They" is becoming acceptable for singular, because he/she is awkward, and just using "he" or "she" is gender specific, though it's another way these things are commonly written. There's nothign wrong with "they", grammatically, and it's far more easy to read than "The contestant picks a prize and the contestant then finds out if the contestant has won"... TheHYPO 22:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Diet Pepsi Max - 12-Ounce change[edit]

Hi, I've changed the article to read 355ml again from 12-Ounces. I assume you were referring to 12 US Fluid Ounces but this wasn't inherently clear. It may be preferable to keep it with an internationally standard measurement rather than a US Customary measurement (For example Imperial Fluid Ounces are different from US Customary Fluid Ounces). Perhaps 12-US FL OZ could be added in parenthesis if you feel it’s important to the article? Quigabyte 04:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Bitter End (poker)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Bitter End (poker), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable game, unreferenced and no references found

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nuttah (talk) 20:28, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]