User talk:C0915033

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello C0915033, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 15:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Spider web. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 15:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Glue ball (spider web)

Hi, there are many reasons why the article you created under the title "Glue ball (spider web)" isn't ready to be put into mainspace. When you are a new editor, it's best to create new articles in Draft space (i.e. with a title beginning "Draft:") and then ask a more experienced editor if it's ready to move to mainspace. I moved your article to Draft:Glue ball (spider web).

There are good points about the article; the referencing is thorough, for example.

You need to read up about editing Wikipedia. Some issues that need to be addressed include:

Is this worth a separate article or should it just be added to Spider web? Why is it notable enough for a whole article?
There are factual errors. the key part for capturing a prey is ball-like glues coated on the spiral silk is true only of ecribellate spiders' webs. Cribellate spiders' webs don't contain glue droplets. The Zschokke (2003) article you cite says clearly that "the gluey coating on viscid silk may be the best single character to define the Araneoidea, the superfamily that includes all ecribellate orb-weavers and the comb-footed spiders". Orb-webs are not "invisible".
There are errors of English and odd English. What does "the glue on the spiral line form changes" mean? Does it mean "the form of the glue on the spiral line changes"? "a water" is wrong. "the phosphate lost from the glue ball" – "the phosphate is lost from the glue ball"? What does "The action of the fixed prey of the glue ball can effectively prevent the prey from escaping" mean?
There are errors of layout and style. For example, see WP:REFPUNCT.
The image needs to be re-done so that it can be viewed on a small screen, e.g. a tablet or large smartphone. It's too wide; it would be better to arrange the individual images in two rows, or else keep them as separate images and display them one under the other.

If I can help, please say so here (adding {{ping|Peter coxhead}} means I'll be notified) or leave a note on my talk page. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:24, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Glue ball (spider web)

Hello, C0915033. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Glue ball".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 14:44, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]