User talk:Candy coated doom
Welcome![edit]
|
October 2008[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Clay Aiken. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CTJF83Talk 22:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
You keep adding the following statement in the List of iCarly episodes article: "During the episode, Sam says she traded lockers with Arthur Gradstein. Arthur Gradstein is one of the writers of iCarly." This is considered trivia, and trivia is generally discouraged on Wikipedia. Please stop adding this in. Also, you added a link to the iCarly article to a website called "The Shay Loft." This appears to be a personal website, and these websites are not allowed to be linked on Wikipedia, according to WP:ELNO item 11. Thanks, 青い(Aoi) (talk) 09:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Muse (band). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
November 2008[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kristen Stewart, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SkyWalker (talk) 20:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bella Swan, you will be blocked from editing. Frickative 16:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Twatlight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Camanda (talk) 19:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Twatlight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Camanda (talk) 19:26, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Twatlight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TN‑X-Man 19:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
December 2008[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Breaking Dawn, you will be blocked from editing. Andrea (talk) 23:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
July 2009[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to iCarly. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Adding an Emmy nomination to the lead of an article is inappropriate and unneeded, please cease doing so immediately. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 07:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
August 2009[edit]
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to List of iCarly episodes. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mokoniki | talk 00:57, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Candy coated doom. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)