Jump to content

User talk:CannabisNerd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello CannabisNerd and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 21:31, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:MapleviewLounge per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MapleviewLounge. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 00:29, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CannabisNerd (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

this account is in fact a duplicate of iburn but it hasnt done anything that isnt allowed and there for shouldnt be blocked but i will accept the results if it is kept blocked. thank you. CannabisNerd (talk) 01:55, 8 December 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, we do allow multiple accounts for legitimate reasons but this is not one of them, regardless of how you may have used it. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

When it's pretty obvious that you've been caught engaging in sockpuppettry, making unblock requests from all three of your accounts is not a sound strategy. OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:01, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of trying to play detective why dont you actually name a legitimate reason this account should be banned. I admitted it was a spare account and that i tried to help my friend but i fail to see a single legitimate reason this account should be banned seeing as it didn't participate in anything against the rules? Wiki itself says multiple accounts are allowed for legitimate reasons does it not? Every contribution from this account has been done with proper effort and citations. Check them yourself or are you always putting in half effort? CannabisNerd (talk) 05:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CannabisNerd (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

daniel i challenge you to name a single reason this account has been misused then? based on what wiki says about these investigations i am innocent until proven guilty. CannabisNerd (talk) 15:10, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not a negotiation or a trial. The reason for the block is given in the SPI, and you don't offer anything to dispute it; arguing process does not do that. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 15:26, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.