User talk:CanonNi/Archives/TII

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambu Lab (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bambu Lab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 08:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Paradox Development Studio timeline

Template:Paradox Development Studio timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- ferret (talk) 02:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Category:17th-century Roman Catholic church buildings in Africa has been nominated for merging

Category:17th-century Roman Catholic church buildings in Africa has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:16th-century Roman Catholic church buildings in Africa has been nominated for merging

Category:16th-century Roman Catholic church buildings in Africa has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Millennia (video game) has been accepted

Millennia (video game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 15:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much! I will continue work on the article. CanonNi (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Your recent editing history at Francis Scott Key Bridge (Baltimore) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are way over 3RR and against the consensus in the talk page section. There's no way there is consensus for the present tense, that's for sure. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm so sorry for breaking the 3RR rule. The reason I reverted the edits is because they seemed like vandalism, as the accounts, such as Thatguy099 and Contributer2024, were newly created and felt like sock puppets of Happydays924. Again, I'm very sorry for violating the 3RR rule and will stop changing the article. CanonNi (talk) 04:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Then you need to read WP:NOTVAND, WP:AGF, and WP:DBQ. I once made the mistake of glossing over all of these, resulting in WP:BITEY behavior. I don't anymore and you shouldn't anymore, either. Reading other threads on your talk page shows that this isn't the first time others have had to talk about this with you so please refrain from reverting vandalism until you are sufficiently well-acquainted with what is and isn't vandalism.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Upon further review, one of the edits indeed was rather unconstructive, namely this one, but the others were (mostly) in good faith and thus not vandalism.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the guides. I will read them fully and stop reverting edits until I have a full understanding of vandalism-related policies. Again, thank you for informing me and I'm sorry for my unconstructive reverts. CanonNi (talk) 05:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:18th-century Roman Catholic churches in the Canary Islands has been nominated for splitting

Category:18th-century Roman Catholic churches in the Canary Islands has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 19:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Car Mechanic Simulator 2021 (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Car Mechanic Simulator 2021 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, CanonNi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Car Mechanic Simulator 2021 (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Car Mechanic Simulator 2021 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mortal Online 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mortal Online 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)