User talk:Cardreader

You make edits, but offer no justification for them.

Incorrect formatting.

I have been editing this page for years now, since its very beginning. You are not going to stop me. I have dealt with many like you.

69.167.22.161

=========

Restored

If you will please notice, your information about the Fire Temple in Baku has been relocated to its own Section 3.9. Please refrain from putting specific and detailed information such as this in the introduction. According to Wikipedia Style guidelines, information that is not general or basic belongs in a subsection. That being said, thank you for your contribution. The information about the Fire Temple is fascinating.

--HistoricalVerification

Hi, Cardreader Thanks for the message. I did put my two cents here.

Raj2004 01:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism

Perhaps you would like to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism? Our Category:Hindutva needs work.--Dangerous-Boy 20:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism

Welcome to WikiProject Hinduism

WikiProject Hinduism — a collaborative effort to improve articles about Hinduism

Discussion board — a page for centralised Hinduism-related discussion

Notice board — contains the latest Hinduism-related announcements

Hindu Wikipedians — Wikipedians who have identified themselves as Hindus

Portal — a portal linking to key Hinduism-related articles, images, and categories

Workgroups — projects with a more specific scopes

For more links, go to the project's navigation template.

--D-Boy 21:23, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for the edit in the textbook article. The POV pushing Witzel gang sneak the comic link and revert war for no reason.Bakaman%% 15:56, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Dalitstan_nations.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Dalitstan_nations.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please upload the image again? It was used on three or four articles. 68.238.3.180 03:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

==

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cardreader (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why has my account been blocked? The reason given is "Primetime" : What does it mean?

Decline reason:

You know what it means. You're the same guy as User:Primetime. Block stands. Have a nice day. —P ilotguy push to talk 00:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cardreader (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please help. I am not User:Primetime

Decline reason:

You were blocked by Dmcdevit, who is a CheckUser. Off you go now. Guy (Help!) 21:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Vaishnava Center for Enlightenment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vaishnava Center for Enlightenment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaishnava Center for Enlightenment (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bharatiya29 20:30, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]