User talk:Castle13

January 2013

Hello, I'm Nowyouseeme. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of Mainstream Top 40 number-one hits of 2013 (U.S.) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! NYSMy talk page 16:08, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I Knew You Were Trouble

Please do not add component charts to articels. When a song has appeared on the main chart (Billboard Hot 100), a separate radio chart should not be added. Widr (talk) 07:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Grammy Award, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.

The image you added did not have any Grammy's being held, as your caption. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 04:45, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove Taylor's photo? She is a grammy winner and I don't see how having her picture as a representation of Grammy winners could be so bad? Please explain your ridiculous action

Proposed deletion of List of number-one artists on the Billboard Artist 100 of the 2010s

The article List of number-one artists on the Billboard Artist 100 of the 2010s has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Number ones on a non-notable chart - doesn't meet WP:LISTN or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 13:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]