User talk:Cheekubaaj

Welcome!

Hello, Cheekubaaj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Amita Bajpai, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 23:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amita Bajpai

A tag has been placed on Amita Bajpai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 23:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Amita Bajpai

Hello, Cheekubaaj, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amita Bajpai whether the article Amita Bajpai should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Amita Bajpai, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 00:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Amita Bajpai. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 09:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Amita Bajpai. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 14:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Hi. I reverted your recent edits to a couple of user pages. I figured that you were just letting off steam, in that it would have been disappointing to see the article on Amita Bajpai deleted. I can understand the sentiment, but I'm afraid that adding inappropriate tags to those user pages will only result in a block, which I don't think would be right - it looks like you were editing in good faith on the article, and it is just unfortunate that the sources weren't there yet for it to be kept. On those grounds I wish you well, but I also have to ask that you don't continue to add speedy deletion tags to the user pages. - Bilby (talk) 11:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WANT MY ARTICLE UNDELETED (Cheekubaaj (talk) 12:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Hi. I'm sorry that the article was deleted, and if I can help I will. However, the problem was that there weren't any sources that discussed Amita Bajpai in detail. Without those sources, we can't create a reliable article on her that we can keep that way - there will always be the possibility that someone will make false claims, and because there is nothing to verify them against, the risk would be that the claims would stay in the article. So one of the rules on Wikipedia is that we can only create articles about people where there is enough that has been published in reliable sources so that we can create a trustworthy (and verifiable) article. It doesn't mean that she isn;t important, or doesn't deserve an article - just that we need the sources in order to write one.

The sources you found were great, but the problem is that they only mentioned her, without giving the sort of detail that is needed. What we're looking for is a couple of paragraphs specifically about her in something like a major newspaper (such as the Times of India), or another respected publication. I'll keep looking, but from what I can tell so far, she is an important person, but there aren't enough to the english-language sources that we need, and I'm afraid I can't help with non-English sources, although if you know of any that would be great as well. (Wikipedia is fine with non-English sources so long as they can be checked by other people). On the plus side, deleting an article now doesn't mean that it can't be added later, when the sources emerge. If the sources we need turn up, we can always recreate the article - even undeleting the current one so that your work isn't lost. We just might have to wait until the right sources come along. - Bilby (talk) 12:56, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Amita Bajpai

The article Amita Bajpai was deleted as a result of the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amita Bajpai, and when an article is deleted its talk page is also deleted - if there's no article, we don't need a page to talk about it. Also, please have a read of WP:CIVIL - comments like "..the administrators are becoming brat.." are not going to get you anywhere. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]