User talk:CheesyAppleFlake

Welcome!

Hello, CheesyAppleFlake! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Fai zan 06:16, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Dispute resolution re McNeill for Electronic cigarette article[edit]

I requested dispute resolution with respect to this here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Electronic_cigarette#Violation_of_consensus

Please join the discussion. Mihaister (talk) 22:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL[edit]

This comment is not appropriate [1]. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By now everyone knows Quack is basically your meatpuppet, after you gave him a barnstar in the middle of a discussion about his repeated disruptive editing.--CheesyAppleFlake (talk) 23:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) For a newish account that shows surprising familiarity with some out-of-the-way happenings from a while ago. Since you mention puppetry, I take it you are familiar with policy in this space. Have you got other accounts here? Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 06:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly out-of-the-way; the incestuous relationship between Quack and Doc James is pretty common knowledge. And no, I don't have other accounts. Do you?--CheesyAppleFlake (talk) 07:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Second warning regarding civility[edit]

This was not an appropriate or collaborative, content-focused comment, and it was just one of many unnecessary sharp comments you've made at that article's already overly-contentious Talk page. Please reconsider your approach to working alongside your fellow editors. Zad68 05:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was perfectly appropriate, because the article is being destroyed by semi-literate idiots intent on forcing a medical agenda onto an article about a consumer product. And you can't seriously tell me that either Sieg Heilman or Quack has any significant mastery of the English language, because they don't.--CheesyAppleFlake (talk) 05:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Doc James and QuackGuru as you have mentioned them here, presumably as two of the individuals you're also identifying here as being included in your comment I've linked to above, in case they wish to respond. Zad68 05:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

We need editors[edit]

Hi Cheesy. The e-cigarette article needs editors. I like having someone else like you who sees the components section as important and in need of developing on the article. But the personal stuff has got to stop. I really really know its hard to bite your tong or sit on your hands. But it doesnt do any good to post some of the stuff they have links of you posting. I truly believe that some people do and say things hoping to get a reaction they can use against you. But posting stuff only plays into their game. Take some time to cool down. Strike the words you have posted in aggravation towards someone else. Be a better person and rise above it. Again, its not easy, it never is, and the Lord knows I have not always followed my own advice in the past. AlbinoFerret 06:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

E cigs[edit]

Have deal with Sieg Heilman for you here 79.79.167.87 (talk) 16:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Secret ^account 16:45, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Electronic cigarette. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! AlbinoFerret 02:44, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]