User talk:Chrisnemelka

November 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at A Marvelous Work and a Wonder. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 18:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Legal threats

In addition to the above, Wikipedia has a clear policy here against legal threats. Please rescind the threat you made in the edit summary here. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 18:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Claim of trademark and legal threats at A Marvelous Work and a Wonder. Thank you. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 18:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wikiisawesome. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to A Marvelous Work and a Wonder— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. /wia /tlk 18:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at A Marvelous Work and a Wonder with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. /wia /tlk 18:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at A Marvelous Work and a Wonder, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: A Marvelous Work and a Wonder was changed by Chrisnemelka (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875211 on 2015-11-08T18:20:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to A Marvelous Work and a Wonder. /wia /tlk 18:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Your recent editing history at A Marvelous Work and a Wonder shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Supdiop (T🔹C) 18:24, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Hut 8.5 18:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've used your access to this page to make further legal threats I've disabled your ability to edit it. Hut 8.5 19:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Chrisnemelka reported by User:Sam Sailor (Result: ). Thank you. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]