User talk:Citg9238

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Citg9238, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mdann52 (talk) 13:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...
I'm writing an article on a video game, and I wish to add reviews from a variety of sources. I found the IDs to add Metacritic and GamesRadar+ to the table, but I'm not sure how to find other IDs. Below is the table as is, with the last entry being one I would like to find the ID for (currently, you can see it as "hl_PC," a placeholder for whatever the correct ID is).

Good afternoon, and welcome to Wikipedia! I've moved the below to User:Citg9238/sandbox, just so you have an area to play with that doesn't interfere with this page.

The docs for that template can be found at Template:Video_game_reviews/doc, which suggest that the site isn't supported by the template. You can add it to the template (or request someone else does at the templates discussion page, Template talk:Video_game_reviews), but looking at the site, it doesn't seem to be notable or widely used, so it might be better off not adding it completely in that section.

Please ping me if I can help further :) Mdann52 (talk) 13:41, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll just leave that review site off of the page. Citg9238 (talk) 00:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I-Fluid (June 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are also no WP:WIKILINKS to assist with context.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:I-Fluid and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 15:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Citg9238! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 15:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]