User talk:Clever curmudgeon

Clever curmudgeon Iodyne 18:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i...am you

why did you go

also what was that physics exam

ok like remember how he said for the purpose of the exam gravity was 10

it wasnt

also what did you get on the calc test

i got a 94/95 did you call him out on it also what did you score also what is your personal information

i will be at school at 8:30 on wednesday and friday catch me if you can

oh good now that i know that picture is uploaded to wikipedia i can begin my "ceiling cat is watching you masturbate" article once and for all

do you think im going to like make a chess board out of images

because im not.

going to.

oh a bunch of minor edits that have nothing to do with content and are at most fixing typos in wikipedia nomenclature.

great.

did you hear that Haya Rashed Al-Khalifa is elected President of the 61st United Nations General Assembly.

Haya Rashed Al-Khalifa

The edit that you made had previously been reverted by another user on the grounds that it was trolling at best. Since you'd made it again, I was perfectly within my rights to revert it because it was still trolling. Since you're the one who made the edit in the first place, the onus is on you either to express yourself sensibly or to provide evidence or both. BigHaz 23:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The least you can do is leave your name on the comments you choose to make on my page. Would you like to provide evidence for your claim that she was involved in the attacks? BigHaz 23:54, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as those in Haya Rashed Al-Khalifa, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --A Y Arktos\^talk 00:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In addition: Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. If you wish to add again the information to the article, please discuss first on the article's talk page citing a source. --A Y Arktos\^talk 00:22, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And furthermore, in relation to your recent comments at User talk:BigHaz: Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. --A Y Arktos\^talk 00:28, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI: "... for having been in collaborating with the ..." is not "flawless" grammar - not even when put in context :-)--A Y Arktos\^talk 01:38, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thats what you think

did you see her areola

Pornographic images

Quote from Wikipedia:Vandalism:

Image vandalism

   Uploading provocative images...

That's why your uploads of porno pictures are getting reverted. NawlinWiki 19:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you feel those images are encyclopedic, please engage in discussion on the relevant talk pages. Enough editors have expressed concern that they are not do not further the encyclopedic goals of this project. --HappyCamper 19:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 24 hours for repeated addition of provokative images to articles. You are welcome to edit constructively after your block expires. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 19:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your images have been speedy deleted

Per the vandalism prevention and speedy delete criteria, your three image contributions have been speedy deleted. Upon the end of your block, should you wish to discuss your thoughts on this, please feel free to do so. Also, since you are now blocked (and provided that you are still interested in constructively contributing to Wikipedia), I would take the opportunity to view our guidelines. Thanks! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 19:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

pornography

I hope you do decide to continue imporving wikipedia, because before you began uploading porn you were not a bad contributor. I do want to give you one piece of advice though - there is a _huge_ difference between imagery that attempts to inform and educate, and imagery that attempts to titillate or shock. In other words: intent matters. It should be obvious to even the most casual observer that there is a huge difference between Michelangelo's david and a woman getting paid to perform oral sex on two performers at once. When considering edgy pictures in the future, keep in mind the line between informative and titillating. --Bachrach44 21:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FAIR

Fair use images are not allowed outside of the main article namespace. Please abide by this, and do not add fair use images onto your userpage. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 22:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a quote from the "policy" section of WP:FAIR if you need confirmation...

"Fair use images should only be used in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are often enough not covered under the fair use doctrine. They should never be used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes) or on user pages."

If you continue to add fair use images onto your userpage, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia in order to prevent you from doing it. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 22:58, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

should a dark lord of the sith even be administering wikipedia i mean last time i checked they are not very trustworthy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Iodyne (talk • contribs) .

Serious matter. Treat it as such. This isn't a joke. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 19:58, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Attack

You reverted an obvious attack on me added by User:Iodyne using popups. If you do it again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 20:16, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not as nice as Deskana. I blocked you anyway. Three hours to learn not to collaborate in attacks on other Wikipedians. --Tony Sidaway 20:54, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

shh they are apparently watching our talk pages

User:Alerante is da disasta masta of dilberts desktop games mutha fucka

funniest show on television because its airbrushed which caption

heh it wuz preety funny

Fair use

YOU HAVE PUT A PICTURE ON USER: IODYNE IT IS FAIR USE RARRR LOVE AN ADMINISTRATOR

check out this page i just made George R. Binks also i wouldnt touch that book with a ten foot pole

you dont want to know

dude emett five caught that shit in like 10 seconds what the fuck who is patrolling obscure star wars characters pages at this time at night this encyclopedia shows me new wonders of ridiculousness every day

eheheh dont you mean dark lord of the being a good wikipedia administrator *sweats* GULP O_O;;;

"bikini"

because wikipedia is lame

Fair use

Exactly what Iodyne said. Except this time I've blocked you for 12 hours for doing it. Don't put fair use images in pages outside of article space. I've warned you before. And for this as well [1]. Comment on content, not on other contributors. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 08:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

see exactly what i said

Do not add vandalism to this page. If you do, this page will be protected and you will lose your priviledges to edit it. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 17:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've increased the length of your block because of this. Twenty-four hours starting from now (or rather from two or three minutes ago). I suggest you just sit out the block without any more vandalism or personal attacks if you don't want another increase. AnnH ♫ 17:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is hypocritical and ignorant. Editing my own talk page is in no way vandalism. It is my page, and I have the right to do whatever I want to it and I did not violate wikipedia law. I would like to see you cite the law I am breaking, but you cannot because you are fabricating your entire justification.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Clever curmudgeon (talk • contribs) 05:57, 14 June 2006 (UTC+10 hours)

I'm sorry, Curm, but you are incorrect. Removing comments on your talk page is vandalism, unless they are vandalism in themselves, and It isn't YOUR page - it belongs to Wikipedia. AT the end of the day, you got blocked for a personal attack against another Wikipedia User, in violation of WP:NPA. Tough cookies, sailor. HawkerTyphoon 20:14, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's too bad because I never put up anything on this page about other users, that's actually what Deskana did. I only editted his comment, I never added anything. Sweet irony.

Argue all you want, you're not going to get anywhere. You changed my signature to attack me. There was no other purpose to it. You've been told all the information you need to know regarding your block. Take the time out to cool off, rather than getting angry about it. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 20:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop worrying about other people who aren't angry when you're the one getting frustrated about being insulted over wikipedia.

Like I said, I'm just going to leave you to talk to yourself now. I will not respond unless I feel great need to- unlikely. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 22:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict - so much the same message) FYI Wikipedia:No personal attacks is policy and states "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor." Your edit attacking another user, even on your "own" talk page is in breach of that policy. See also Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines and note in passing that "Talk pages are not for general chatter".--A Y Arktos\^talk 20:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i nominate User:Clever curmudgeon for speedy deletion

Blocked

You have been blocked for 1 month for continued harrassment and vandalism after being with less harshly by other administrators. --Cyde↔Weys 19:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no logic for this block. Please explain what wikipedia rule I have violated.

You've violated WP:ENC. --Cyde↔Weys 19:48, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also try WP:DICK. I bet you wouldn't like it if I went around pretending to be you. Just give up trying to say we're violating policies when your edits are clearly unacceptable. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 19:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

uhhhhhhhhh O_o

isnt user clever curmudgeons opinion on dark lord desanka a branch of knowledge

got you there mr admin—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iodyne (talk • contribs) .

Actually, it's a violation of WP:NPA. Stop trying to cause arguments. I suspect you've not even read WP:NPA. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 19:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

how was it not a personal attack on me when an admin immediately assumed a page i had created was facecious? regardless of my past behavior I provided proper sources and anyone reading the article could easily access them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iodyne (talk • contribs) .

That was a mistake. The page wasn't deleted, no harm done. I've had enough of going round in circles with you, so I have no intention of responding to further comments from you, again, unless I feel a great need to (unlikely). --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 06:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

so instead of telling me youre not going to respond to me why dont you

you know

just do that

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rope1948film.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rope1948film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:19, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:JonFinchTireIron.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:JonFinchTireIron.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 22:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kampfmesser 42

The article Kampfmesser 42 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oneiros (talk) 18:36, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:DilbertsDesktopGames.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DilbertsDesktopGames.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:01, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]