User talk:Coastiestevie

Welcome!

Hello, Coastiestevie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! MikeTheEditor104 (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Commonwealth of Dracul

Hello Coastiestevie,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Commonwealth of Dracul for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dom from Paris (talk) 10:45, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Commonwealth of Dracul. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with blocks or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 11:04, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Commonwealth of Dracul

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Commonwealth of Dracul, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dom from Paris (talk) 11:30, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Commonwealth of Dracul, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 11:38, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Commonwealth of Dracul

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Commonwealth of Dracul, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dom from Paris (talk) 19:59, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Commonwealth of Dracul. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with blocks or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 20:01, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Given your discussion here it is clear that you intent to continue attempting to create an article about some made-up micronation; as such:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:57, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If at some point you decide you want to contribute to the encyclopedia in a way that does not promote your non-notable made-up micronation, you can request an unblock-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:57, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coastiestevie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the individual that used my account and created an article that was marked as a hoax no longer lives here. This issue will not reoccur again.

Decline reason:

Since you say someone else operated your account, it is now considered compromised and is no longer eligible for unblocking. 331dot (talk) 07:38, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coastiestevie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If the account is considered compromised, I would like to request it be deleted. I would then like to create a new account that is not considered compromised. The account however is not compromised because the unauthorized user does not have the username and password. The actions were taken on my computer, not theirs while they resided here. To continue to ban this account permanently and prevent me from having access because of someone elses actions, that I was unaware of, which I myself have corrected is unfair and I have already taken steps to prevent them from gaining access again. I believe that is sufficient and fair enough. As you are aware, all actions on wiki are recorded, which means if abuse was to ever occur again, you would have it on record that this commitment to ensure proper actions with this account were not taken. That would then be justification to permanently ban this account. Thank you for your time. Coastiestevie (talk) 08:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Accounts cannot be deleted. You say it is unfair to hold you accountable for the actions taken by this account, but I'm afraid you are mistaken. You are responsible for all actions taken by this account and for the security of this account. I'll also note that none of your contributions in more than seven years have been constructive. Yamla (talk) 09:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.