User talk:Codrcrew

March 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bishonen | tålk 09:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Self-admitted, block-evading sock of User:Theabbie per this. You need to log in to your original account and appeal on User talk:Theabbie. Socking is just compounding your previous vandalism, and making it less likely you'll be unblocked. If you really want to be a Wikipedia editor, I recommend you to try the standard offer. Bishonen | tålk 09:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brazen Epiphany (March 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:17, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Codrcrew! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 16:17, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The first priority for Wikipedia should be authenticity, notability is a disguised term, Wikipedia is for spreading knowledge Codrcrew (talk) 16:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]