User talk:Cognitivebro

March 2018

Your recent edits to Chan Zuckerberg Initiative could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:22, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:22, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

• I tried to add a source but your mobile website is bad. Also I did cite the Boston Globe. Cognitivebro (talk) 02:25, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Hmm our mobile access is tricky, no doubt. Sorry. But I had to revert--and even if the content was verified, I don't see how it was very relevant or encyclopedic: it's a tiny, tiny note in her biography. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 02:31, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, actually it is encyclopedic and not a tiny note at all. It alludes to a mass email that Airbnb.com sent out to thousands of residents about the policies, interests, and perceived overreach of the chairman of the Boston City Council, which in turn is reflective of overreach of the central government of Boston. Cognitivebro (talk) 03:38, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

September 2020

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 15:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)