User talk:CommanderShinzon

Welcome!

Hello, CommanderShinzon, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Ziggurat (Constructus Corporation album), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Helmut von Moltke (talk) 03:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Ziggurat (Constructus Corporation album)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Ziggurat (Constructus Corporation album), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Helmut von Moltke (talk) 03:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Ziggurat (Constructus Corporation album)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Ziggurat (Constructus Corporation album), CommanderShinzon!

Wikipedia editor WebCite just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hello, Wikipedian. This message is to let you know the article you recently created has been reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment on WebCite's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Reference errors on 18 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the The Ziggurat (Constructus Corporation album) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chappie 2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chappie 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chappie 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chappie 2

Do you have any reliable sources which confirm its existence? Because the page needs them. Crboyer (talk) 23:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have some sources that confirm its existence, here's the links. https://www.instagram.com/p/BMt32iQhqqw/?tagged=chappie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqJ3VIiI8r4&t=8s https://movie.co.id/chappie-2/sinopsis

Thank you, Crboyer. From CommanderShinzon (talk) 1:00, 13 November 2016 (PST)

Nomination of Chappie 2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chappie 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chappie 2 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 02:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 12 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Chappie 2 page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chappie 2 (2nd nomination), you may be blocked from editing. In this edit, you blanked an entire AfD. You've also blanked a talk page and removed an AfD header. This is highly disruptive. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CommanderShinzon, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Feinoha ^Talk 19:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You are blocked for 60 hours for logging out and abusively editing anonymously. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:26, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vanjagenije, i apologize for making abusively edits on Wikipedia, i promise not to do that again so please unblock me. CommanderShinzon (talk) 11:56 PM, 14 November 2016 (PST)

Please, see WP:GAB. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

CommanderShinzon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16912 was submitted on Nov 15, 2016 21:44:48. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:44, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually debating giving him a longer block. He deliberately created a hoax article, Chappie 2. Here's what he did in that article alone:

Tried using random Instagram posts as proof that the bike in the photo is one that will be used in a sequel.
Linked to this page claiming it's the poster for Chappie 2, however a look shows that it's very clearly the poster from the first film, with a "2" photoshopped onto it.
He also created a YT video, trying to claim that it's a production photo from the sequel. Given that he was misrepresenting other sources, I think that it's very likely that this is a photograph taken from the first film or another film entirely and not something from Chappie 2.
He claims that Tom Hanks, a 60 year old man, will be portraying a younger version of a character played by a man in his 40s.
He tries claiming that the film's director has hired a film student, an unknown film student that has presumably not graduated from school and has no work that would otherwise bring him to the director's attention, as the DoP for a film that if it did exist, would have been a wide release movie. That by itself is very unlikely.

This isn't even taking into consideration that Blomkamp has outright stated that the movie is not going to happen. If any of this was going to happen, especially given the star power in the movie (Tom Hanks alone would command headlines from all of the major newspapers and film websites), there would be an abundance of coverage. This coverage does not exist and what was placed in the article was very deliberate, especially with the misrepresentation of sourcing. I'm going to look at their prior edits as an IP in the AfD for Chappie 2 said that this was not the first time he's added false information to Wikipedia. If I see anything else on here, I'm extending the block, possibly permanently. Hoaxes are not tolerated on Wikipedia and honestly, there's no way that this page could have been anything other than a deliberate attempt at misinformation for whatever their reasons were - and then an attempt to retain the information by disrupting the AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, you even tried to say that the director himself was lying by pointing to the very tweet that he said was a lie and posting links to items that aren't even remotely true - one of which you created yourself. That's extremely deliberate. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't even have to look long. It looks like Super Evil (Constructus Corporation album) is a hoax, as it claims that it was released in 2007 - a good four years after the group disbanded in 2003. They also claim that the band disbanded in 2009, which is not held up by the article for the band. It also doesn't help that there doesn't seem to be any album by this name. The only thing I found was a track released as a solo thing by Watkin Tudor Jones. As far as I can tell, this album never existed and the band was considered to be non-existent after the group dissolved in 2003. There was also an attempt to cover up other people trying to point out the album's nonexistence, as CommanderShinzon blanked the article's talk page after an IP and Daylon124 questioned the article's legitimacy. I'm sorry, but that's two deliberate hoaxes and at least two attempts to perpetuate misinformation on Wikipedia. These hoaxes were so blatant that there's no way that this was an honest mistake on your part - at this level this is a deliberate action on your part. I'm making the block permanent. You might be able to be unblocked, but you will have to explain why you did this and convince us as to why you should be allowed to edit once more. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still finding evidence that you were adding false information to Wikipedia. Right now any and all edits by you are considered to be suspect, honestly. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:03, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another hoax article, Blackhole (Constructus Corporation album). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:03, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I honestly have to question how much of the content at The Ziggurat (Constructus Corporation album) is legitimate at this point, given the amount of hoax information you've added elsewhere. I've redirected it since its independent notability is in question, as is the information in the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:23, 17 November 2016 (UTC)'[reply]
Tokoygirl79 I apologize for making hoax articles such as Super Evil, Blackhole. I made a fan-made album of The Constructus Corporation with random songs from Jones's bands such as MaxNormal.TV, The Constructus Corporation, Fucknrad, etc. And i also want to apologize for posting fake photos of Chappie 2, i thought they were from the sequel but they are not, so please i want to continue editing and i don't want to be blocked forever. CommanderShinzon 12:15 PM (PST), November 17, 2016.

November 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've added far too much misinformation to Wikipedia. It's added in such a deliberate fashion and you've even done disruptive editing in order to keep it on here, to the point where I have to assume that you knew full well what you were doing. There's no room left for this to be an honest mistake, as you manufactured a good deal of this from thin air, despite evidence that would point towards these claims being false. To be unblocked you'd have to explain why you did what you did and convince us that we can trust you. Honestly, given that you've created several hoax articles shortly after signing up about a month ago, I would argue against any unblock. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

CommanderShinzon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16933 was submitted on Nov 17, 2016 18:50:44. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:CommanderShinzon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:CommanderShinzon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WNYY98 (talk) 03:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]