User talk:Cowboys42119
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Cowboys42119, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ᴀɴᴏɴʏᴍᴜᴤᴤ ᴜᴤᴇʀ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
[edit]Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2019 Dallas Cowboys season, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Your opinion of AI on Wikipedia?
[edit]Hi @Cowboys42119:
It looks like you’ve been editing on Wikipedia for a while. Welcome! I’m a researcher working on Wikipedia algorithms and artificial intelligences (AIs). Maybe it seems a little random to hear from someone like me…if you’ve only been here for a little while, why would we care about your opinion?
You may or may not be aware of them, but the algorithms that operate on Wikipedia affect new editors like you in very important ways. Even if you’ve only made a few edits, we really need to understand how you feel about your initial experiences -- good or bad -- so that we can make sure that the AIs we build in the future do what users like you want them to do.
Would you consider talking with me briefly about AI on Wikipedia? I will send you a $15 Amazon gift card to say thanks. Reply to this message here or send me an email at smit3694@umn.edu and I can share more info and plan a time to connect.
Best, Estelle, aka FauxNeme (talk) 16:52, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Your edit [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pittsburgh_Steelers&diff=893519691&oldid=892497670[/url] is wrong and should be removed. Brown didn't retire from the Steelers. He was traded, therefore his number is still open to be reissued. 162.27.12.130 (talk) 06:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]January 2020
[edit]Hello, I'm Eagles247. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2020 Dallas Cowboys season, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:38, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
At this point, consensus supports the change of the number of Pro Bowl/All Pro selections in this (and other) NFL season pages to at least four, as a way to reduce the length of very long pages and to make this list more exclusive as more players are selected to the Pro Bowl in a given year. You have ignored the discussion for over a week, and then finally added a baseless argument. Please stop your unconstructive editing or I will report your (and my) editing to the administrators' noticeboard (where my editing has followed the general rule of the bold, revert, discuss cycle and yours has been imposing your will on an article despite multiple editors disagreeing with you). Frank AnchorTalk 14:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
[edit]Hello, I'm Eagles247. Your recent edit to the page Template:Dallas Cowboys roster appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Dallas Cowboys season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Randall Cobb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)