User talk:Cristiansorin

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Cristiansorin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 09:31, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pleşu[edit]

The material you're adding to the Andrei Pleșu article, the way you're sourcing the article and the phrasing are all in breach of several policies. I will do you the service of pointing them out to you again: WP:BLP, WP:NOT, WP:WEASEL, WP:SYNTH. I will also add WP:RS and WP:ATTR, and will suggest you read through at least some of them before pushing the same lame edits through. The most important of these is the BLP one, counting as "unsourced or poorly sourced material" - re-adding the text over and over without even discussing the change will most likely result in you compromising your account, particularly since you're using an IP to "supplement" the changes you make with your account.Your persistence in adding deceitful and defamatory material will result in me reporting you to WP:BLPN, and admins there will be in a position to judge whether you're using the editing privileges to contribute encyclopedic material.

Let me also add: the other 90% of your edits so far appear to be placing you in a conflict of interest (another policy I submit to your attention). Dahn (talk) 02:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks: the experiment was successful. (Cristiansorin (talk) 07:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludwig Staiger (April 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ludwig Staiger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludwig Staiger has been accepted[edit]

Ludwig Staiger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]