Hello, Culturclopedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Randykitty (talk) 13:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, probably an encyclopedic article could be written about this journal, but the version that you restored is flawed in many ways. For some suggestions on how to write a good article on an academic journal, see our journal article writing guide. Given the current state of the article, I think it is better to maintain the redirect to the Center. If I find some time in the coming days, I'll have a go at it myself, but until a more acceptable version is created, please do not restore that flawed/promotional version. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 09:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your response. After another editor's critique of the article, I've been searching for criticism of the journal to add. Any help you could provide to fix this entry would be appreciated. Perhaps deleting the parts of the article that seem most opinionated would solve the problem? Culturclopedia (talk) 15:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
