User talk:Cyrilet

March 2015

Hello, I'm Malik Shabazz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sofía Vergara because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrilet, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Cyrilet! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, I'm ToonLucas22. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lionel Messi— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TL22 (talk) 20:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Theo Walcott, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 20:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Cristiano Ronaldo. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. QED237 (talk) 20:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]