User talk:DAOWAce

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thanks, Dan.

You ruined my reputation once again.

After everything I put up with through our 12 year friendship, you still insult me. You still call me ignorant. You still call me arrogant. You still call me the stupidest person alive and always, always, boast about how 'godly' you are.

Well thanks. I can only wonder what else you've destroyed as I try to remember what uses those old passwords.

It's over. Never try to contact me again for the rest of my life.

Check my site,, for more updates on this matter. - DAOWAce (talk) 01:31, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Xfire has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy! [message] 23:28, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Xfire. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tommy! [message] 23:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Xfire, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 23:32, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg
You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

EdJohnston (talk) 23:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

DAOWAce (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))

Request reason:

Account was logged into by friend who knew my older passwords. Changed password when I checked my talk page and found these vandalism reports. I'm so disgusted with people I call friends. If you need backing text, I can provide a chatlog. EDIT: You can see my userpage for complete proof. I feel so violated. He is no longer my friend as of today.

Decline reason:

Sorry. WP:GOTHACKED applies here. --jpgordon::==( o ) 00:30, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

I reverted this user page vandalism. --bonadea contributions talk 07:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate it. Was worried it'd stay there until I could undo it myself. OT: It's sad to see that I was reverting vandalism and requested protection on the article which my closest friend vandalized and got me blocked on wiki from. Even if it is only 2 days, it's destroyed my reputation. I honestly can never forgive him. You (anyone) can see what's happened on my site's main page. - DAOWAce (talk) 10:43, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hello there. You can always simply stop using this account and create a new one if you'd like. Just remember, we can't tell who's who via an account so if any IP or account is vandalizing, even one of an experienced administrator, it's likely to blocked, regardless. Tommy! [message] 09:03, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If my previous contributions were checked and compared to the vandalism I did, I believe it would've been obvious that someone had broken into my account to perform such a task. Regardless, I will not create a new username. I am DAOWAce across the internet and have been for the last 13 years of my life. That won't change. It was only a temporary block anyway, and my friend was locked out of my account before I even got blocked, but the vandalism report was already going through processing so it was too late. - DAOWAce (talk) 20:49, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from Beeshoney[edit]

I accept your apology - that is understandable. However, since you have openly admitted that your account was hacked by another person, your account cannot be unblocked. You will have to create a new one. It's not a great loss though, as you have done fewer than 100 edits with this account. I hope you continue to enjoy editing Wikipedia. Beeshoney (talk) 09:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you do check back on your reply, please read what I said in response to Tommy above. - DAOWAce (talk) 20:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]