User talk:DCBotTrick

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hot Boyz (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Moocha (talk) 18:03, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I suggest you do stuff like this again. Moocha (talk) 11:55, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

.

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Martin Luther King, Jr., did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Martin Luther King, Jr. was changed by DCBotTrick (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943656 on 2011-05-20T20:50:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, DCBotTrick, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. mechamind 9 0 06:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My name does not end with "bot" so it does not violate the username policy.DCBotTrick (talk) 14:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's the "DCBot" portion that could be regarded by some as a bot username. mechamind 9 0 17:19, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"also, unless your account is an approved bot, your name should not end with "bot", which is used to identify bot accounts" My username ends with "Trick." You could also be reading the username wrong, ever think it's DCB-ot-Trick? I'm not a bot DCBotTrick (talk) 19:58, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Wash (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. E♴(talk) 17:38, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism, and ignoring repeated warnings, the most recent violation being this edit to Roger Ebert. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:35, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DCBotTrick (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why was I blocked from editing? Give me examples, I'm an example kind of a person.DCBotTrick (talk) 20:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Right. Kuru (talk) 20:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.