User talk:DIG.MUKHERJEE

August 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Barrackpore have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Barrackpore was changed by DIG.MUKHERJEE (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955226 on 2021-08-01T22:44:19+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste articles

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

-- Ekdalian (talk) 12:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm Ekdalian. You have been adding or changing content in an article, Mahishya, but you didn't provide any explanation, and didn't engage in talk page discussions even after being informed thet a new section has been created in the relevant talk page for discussion on the 'dominant caste' issue. Also, the recent revision history of the article is clearly visible to you. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia or unexplained reverts like you have done. 'Last best' will not work here since there has been enough explanation and also an ongoing talk page discussion. You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mahishya; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 12:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Mahishya, you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 05:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not personal analysis it is what according to the definition which already mentioned about forward caste or general caste context in wikipedia only. DIG.MUKHERJEE (talk) 05:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You removed "agrarian" which is referenced and instead replaced with "forward caste". —SpacemanSpiff 06:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DIG.MUKHERJEE! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Mahishya that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 06:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mahishya, you may be blocked from editing. Ekdalian (talk) 07:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—SpacemanSpiff 07:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Biswas, you may be blocked from editing. Ekdalian (talk) 18:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]