User talk:Daftnovaseven

May 2024

Hello, I'm Gottagotospace. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John Chard have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Gottagotospace (talk) 18:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Chard. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Gottagotospace (talk) 18:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jayom

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jayom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Extremely clear that subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, especially since in edits the user has tried to make on the John Chard article, it said that Jayom is the "the great step nephew" of Chard, which is quite a distant relation

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gottagotospace (talk) 18:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

apology

@Gottagotospace I would like to apologise for the distasteful and disrespectful comment I have left on your 'talk' page. I understand now fully the exactitude of the sanctions and removals you conducted on my edits and pointless article. I realise now my stupidity for not acknowledging the numerous warnings and constructive feedback you placed on my page. furthermore, I would like to apologise for any distress I may have caused regarding the personal attacks I included during my rage-fuelled comment. it is clear that my gross misconduct occurred too recently for me to make an appeal: and in fact I have no reason to currently, I have no constructive edits to make on Wikipedia. I simply wish to apologise for wasting your time, and commend you for your swift and effective eradication of vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daftnovaseven (talk • contribs) 13:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the apology! I'm glad you now see why we provided you with that feedback. If you would like to make a block appeal once you have constructive edits to make, feel free! Gottagotospace (talk) 13:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]