User talk:Dakota Allie L.

Hello, Dakota Allie L., and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 22:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Getting started

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

Finding your way around

• Table of contents
• Directories and indexes
• Department directory

Editing articles

• How to develop an article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help

• Frequently asked questions
• Cheatsheet
• Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
• The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
• Help pages
• Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

• Community Portal
• Join a WikiProject
• Follow Wikipedia etiquette
• Practice civility
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

April 2022

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 April 3. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please stop personalizing disputes. This is way out of line. Drmies (talk) 19:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes, "bigot" is a common reaction to transsexual activism. Admittedly, I went a bit over the edge, and will tone it down in the future. Dakota Allie L. (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Dakota Allie L. - I want to take a few minutes and express my appreciation to you for responding in such a fair and cordial manner. When responding to heated discussions where personal emotions and feelings are absolutely involved, many users respond to these kinds of warnings about civility and personal attacks, and with even more anger and rage. It's a fresh sight to see your reply.

Please know that your kind of attitude, your ability to accept feedback and self-reflect, and your willingness to commit toward improving your contributions and interactions, is an absolute treasure that you should always keep close to you. There are many great users here who write book-loads of content, make many edits and changes, and who do a lot of "heavy lifting" on Wikipedia... but who completely lack the attitude and self-reflection that you have. They always point fingers and add fire to heated disputes, make no attempt to seek a positive environment for collaboration, and who will absolutely positively never accept responsibility for their mistakes. It's always someone else's fault, never theirs.

Thanks again, and I hope to see you around the project! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

I feel if I want my cause to be taken seriously, then I'll have to reel back on insulting people. Dakota Allie L. (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and WP:Righting great wrongs. Improving the visibility of diverse identities through accurate and neutral language is good, but furthering sociopolitical causes is not a goal of this project. Wikipedia follows reliable sources, which seem to regard transgender people as a superset including transsexual people.

Persuasive arguments are based in Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, rather than the political beliefs of contributors like you or I. Some relevant content guidelines are:

• WP:Category names
• WP:Article titles
• WP:Neutral point of view
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style § Gender identity.

Bludgeoning the point will not help get you the result you want, and anti-gender polemic ad nauseum will do nothing except evaporate sympathy for your plight, especially among "woke" "girldicked" "she-male" "queers" like myself. You've made your views on the discussion perfectly clear already. Please back away from the carcass and allow WP:Consensus to form naturally. Warm regards, RoxySaunders (talk · contribs) 20:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

So you're open about the fact that you're a male paraphiliac? Yeah, as a woman born with transsexualism, I want nothing to do with your lot. Dakota Allie L. (talk) 20:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

I doubt I'll get any sympathy out of your lot anyway. You just love flapping your fetish around in public. Get your cock cut off and be a REAL woman or stop the charade altogether! Dakota Allie L. (talk) 21:05, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

All "reliable sources" nowadays are influenced by the woke. Force-lumping me in with paraphilic genderists by reducing transsexual to "transgender", and even force lumping me with the severely disabled by removing Asperger syndrome. Dakota Allie L. (talk) 21:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

• You are treading dangerously close to being blocked. I suggest you drop the WP:STICK and walk away. This should be understood as a Final Warning. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

I could be less rude, but I think Wikipedia is VERY biased. The facts of transsexualism are essentially restricted to one page (the transsexual page), the rest is all appeals to the gender religion and nonbinaryism. Dakota Allie L. (talk) 20:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert - gender and sexuality

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Sideswipe9th (talk) 22:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia as a blog, web host, social networking site, forum or a memorial site. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)