User talk:Daniel The Blogger

August 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Zsinj. I noticed that in this edit to David Gelernter, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zsinj^Talk 18:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the original author of the entry on David Gelernter? Daniel The Blogger (talk) 12:27, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Daniel The Blogger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Woke did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:37, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media."

Then, why don't they? Daniel The Blogger (talk) 12:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Prohibition in the United States, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 21:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cleopatra (1963 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To what are you referring. Give specific detailed examples. Daniel The Blogger (talk) 12:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 07:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]