User talk:Danjkahn

Proposed deletion of 3 2 1

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 3 2 1, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 3 2 1

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 3 2 1, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dekisugi (talk) 12:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 3 2 1

An article that you have been involved in editing, 3 2 1, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3 2 1. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Guillermo Coria, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Guillermo Coria was changed by Danjkahn (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952977 on 2012-07-03T13:09:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:09, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm DemocraticLuntz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Swansea because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 17:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]