User talk:Darwave81

User:Darwave81--Darwave81 (talk) 16:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noctivagus (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noctivagus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noctivagus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Darwave81! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 15:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello Sulfurboy (talk) What is really important! is that you tell me what are credible sources for you or for wikipedia in english??? I did put (books, movie and newspaper) :) --Darwave81 (talk) 18:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Darwave81, If you review WP:RS and WP:RSPSOURCES, I think you'll find that many of your sources are problematic, although not all of them.

ok!Sulfurboy (talk) So tell me which sources are problematic and I remove them and which ones can I use? and which ones are missing and I research...--Darwave81 (talk) 18:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi what happened to the draft noctiva

Hi what happened to the draft Noctivagus (band)?...

 Darwave81 (talk) 00:06, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

It is here: Draft:Noctivagus (band) – Thjarkur (talk) 09:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Noctivagus (band)

Hello, Darwave81

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Eagleash and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Noctivagus (band), should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noctivagus (band).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Eagleash}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Eagleash (talk) 12:08, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Draftifications

Hi, please do not move articles to drafts. Only brand new articles with severe problems are moved to drafts, WP:DRAFTIFY. Other articles have to go through WP:AFD. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Why not? I did a new article about noctivagus. after because someone did a delete of the a old article who was on line 2 years and oother try to do a new before this and someobe did delete again. In this case i only put the band in draft i did not delete. Darwave81 (talk) 22:14, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Before that the artcle was delete because someone move to draft first( the article about noctivagus)m. A them delete. Why you did not put to delete you move for article again...? Why you did that? If has to go to delete?... Darwave81 (talk) 22:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Why the other article? Was move the article to draft after two years them to delete? If you are saying that if are a article go to delete and not for draft? But you put in article again why?... Darwave81 (talk) 22:41, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

The article on Noctivagus was discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, with the discussion resulting in a draftification. Draftspace on Wikipedia is very hidden, if an article is sent there and there is no one around who notices it and fixes the article, it will end up being deleted in six months as an abandoned draft. Because moving to drafts can end up in unintentional loss of content, the current norms around moving to drafts only allow us to move brand new articles with severe problems to drafts without discussion. All other articles need to be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. I'm not sure I understand what your two last questions are about, could you reword them? – Thjarkur (talk) 22:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

The other question was why this article who do not have enough references is a article and why the noctivagus article who as books movie etc... is again on draft. I do not understand and all the others bands i also put one draft. Have one or two references and are a article? Darwave81 (talk) 23:12, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

These articles were created back in 2005 when Wikipedia's standards were much lower. People are slowly working on bringing all this old stuff up to standard by adding good sources, but some of it ends up being nominated for deletion if it turns out the subject isn't notable enough. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noctivagus (band) (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noctivagus (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noctivagus (band), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Noctivagus (band)

Hello, Darwave81. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Noctivagus (band), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC)