User talk:Dcole2011

Welcome!

Hello, Dcole2011, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Vsmith (talk) 13:30, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete referenced content without providing a valid reason or explanation. Vsmith (talk) 13:30, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss your concerns on Talk:Microevolution rather than WP:edit warring and deleting sourced content. Vsmith (talk) 13:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Microevolution. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- dsprc ^[talk] 13:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Microevolution with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster _talk 13:49, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Microevolution shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 13:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dcole2011 reported by User:Dougweller (Result: ). Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 14:01, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Microevolution. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Wifione ^Message 16:12, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reverted by 5 editors now. If you revert again when you come off your block you'll be blocked again as it will be seen as just more editwarring. You really need to use the talk page to get agreement.