User talk:Deadstar0

Welcome!

Hello, Deadstar0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Marasmusine (talk) 12:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning Pezophaps

I redirected Pezophaps (Genus) to Rodrigues Solitaire because there is only one known species in the genus, and making separate pages for the species and genus of a monotypic genus is very redundant. I hope you understand.--Mr Fink (talk) 12:47, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly advice

Hi, great work on the ant articles: Acromyrmex niger and Acromyrmex ambiguus. Could I ask that you provide inline citations to show which sources each fact has come from. This helps others in checking that information is verifiable. I'll show you how here: ^[1]

^ Dr Bla Bla X species doing whatever

If you edit this then you'll be able to see the text formats to use. Please message me if you have any questions. Thanks again! Smartse (talk) 23:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Buccal pouches"?

Hi Deadstar0,
I'm not a scientist, but it would seem to me somewhat odd that an arthropod like A. crassispinus has "buccal pouches". The tem would appear to me to be only applicable to vertebrates, and mammals in particular. Hamsters cerainly have them. And Dizzy Gillespie could puff out his cheeks out like no-one else. Should that perhaps possibly read "cavities inside their mouths" or something similar?
--Shirt58 (talk) 11:33, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Acromyrmex lundii

Hello, I reverted one edit from the Acromyrmex lundii article per A catalogue of the ants of Paraguay (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), by A.L. Wild (2007), p. 41. A. pubescens and A. nigrosetosus have been elevated from subsp. while A. parallelus has been removed.--Obsidi♠n^Soul 19:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leafcutter articles

Good work on your expansion of those articles. Well done! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:21, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

Please be aware that copying text verbatim from other sources is considered plagiarism. Parts of your article on Acromyrmex echinatior were taken from the relevant article on AntWeb ("In Costa Rica this species prefers open dry habitats such as urban areas around San Jose and seasonally dry habitats of Guanacaste Province" ; "Queens multiply mate, and colonies are facultatively polygynous"). I have not investigated whether other parts were similarly plagiarised from other sources. While the text at AntWeb is available under a free license, it is a license which requires atribution, and AntWeb was not included even as an external link. Please could you have another look at the article and note the sources you used in writing it, making it clear which parts are copied wholesale, and adding inline references to appropriate sources. --Stemonitis (talk) 07:40, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Demographic history of Croatia

The article Demographic history of Croatia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

excessive listing of statistics which is explicitly against policy, conflating population by language and by ethnicity, focusing solely on ethno-national matters in a single century = coat-racking

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:51, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Dr Bla Bla X species doing whatever

[1]